Our church has struggled financially this year. Our
superintendent has been understanding; he even helped us with a check from the
Conference.
We felt we were making progress when the pastor
called an emergency Administrative Council meeting between Christmas and the New
Year. To a very sparse crowd, a member of the congregation offered a large gift
if we would pay our apportionments 100 percent. We were taken aback by this
proposal.
The decision was deferred until after Dec. 30, when
more could attend. The Finance Committee was uncomfortable about taking a gift
with such strings attached, and made the suggestion that apportionments be paid
with existing funds, not the gift. The gift has been placed in our regular
offering.
We have many questions, but the main one is how the
church feels about gifts with strings attached, and should the Ad. Council
question the intents of the Finance Committee?
Signed,
Confused Treasurer
It seems you have several dilemmas. One is the power
of the Administrative Council. How should it work with the Finance Committee?
Should it abide by the committee's suggestions, or override them?
The Ad Council probably has the power to override
the suggestions of the Finance Committee, since the Finance Committee reports to
the Ad. Council, and not the reverse. But the issue is more clouded than that.
The pastor called an emergency meeting at an inconvenient time and without
talking to the treasurer or Finance Committee. It seems there's an issue of
keeping everyone on the same page. It is hard to make good decisions under
pressure.
Then, there is the matter of the "gift." The church
member wanted things done his/her way, and was willing to negotiate the tithe.
Unfortunately, people often vote with their money. If they do not like what is
happening, they will withhold their offerings, or offer money as an incentive to
get their way.
This is an old controversy in the church. The fourth
chapter of Acts tells how people brought their gifts and laid them at the feet
of the apostles. Then Ananias and Sapphira gave a gift, holding back part. They
wanted people to appreciate them for their gift. They did it for reasons other
than to help out.
When this happens, the whole fabric of trust is
torn. Many in your church may have feelings about what was done, or attempted.
Some healing is needed. Since that crisis is past, this might be a good time to
have a discussion with the pastor and the Ad. Council about how the church will
do its business. How can we make difficult decisions together? How can we work
together in trust? Often, if healing does not occur, things get worse.
It appears your church handled this pretty well. You
delayed the decision until more could be present. The Finance Committee amended
the proposal so that the "giver" did not control the outcome. We send our best
wishes to you and your congregation.
Sincerely,
Susan and Ed Alley
Letters may be sent to the Alleys at the Kairos Center for
the Family, 4337 Kessler Blvd. N. Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46228. E-mail:
eskairos@aol.com
.